Τετάρτη 30 Μαρτίου 2016

Types of reactors used for biodiesel production

Three general types of reactors are used for biodiesel production: batch reactors, semi-continuous-flow reactors, and continuous-flow reactors.

The batch process is inexpensive, requiring much less initial capital and infrastructure investment. It is flexible and allows the user to accommodate variations in feedstock type, composition, and quantity. The major drawbacks of the batch process include low productivity, larger variation in product quality, and more intensive labor and energy requirements.
The semi-continuous process is similar to the batch process except that the producer starts by reacting a smaller volume than the vessel will hold and then continues to add ingredients until the vessel is full. This process is labor intensive and not commonly used.
Continuous transesterification processes are preferred over batch processes in large-capacity commercial production because these processes result in consistent product quality and low capital and operating costs per unit of product. The most common type of continuous-flow reactor is the continuous stirred-tank reactor. Other types of continuous-flow reactors are also used commercially, including ultrasonic reactors and supercritical reactors. These alternative procedures can speed up the reaction.
]
Batch Reactors
The batch reactor can be simply a tank that is equipped with some type of agitation. The tank is filled with the reactants for the process (in this case oil, alcohol, and catalyst), and then the agitator is operated for some period of time. After the required time has elapsed, the contents of the reactor are drained out and further processed.
The main characteristic of a batch reactor is that it starts with unreacted material, causes it to react, and then at a later time ends up with reacted material. That is, a batch reactor contains different types of material depending on which time one happens to look at it.
Batch reactors are generally used in small biodiesel production plants. A disadvantage of batch processes is that, to increase production, it might be necessary to increase the physical size of the plant by a proportional amount (by buying another reactor, for example). In contrast, when using a continuous flow process, it is usually possible to increase the plant’s production capacity by increasing the feed rate or shortening the reaction time.

Continuous-Flow Reactors
The most common continuous-flow system in biodiesel production is the continuous stirred-tank reactor (CSTR). At first glance a CSTR, appears to be identical to a batch reactor. In fact, often the actual reactor may be the same, but additional controls are needed to set the reactor up in a continuous-flow system. Some continuous-flow plants may be able to operate in either batch or continuous mode.
In a CSTR, the reactants are continuously added and the product (mixture of different chemicals, including unreacted reactants) continuously withdrawn. Adequate agitation is required to ensure uniform chemical composition and temperature. The continuous-flow process typically requires intricate process controls and online monitoring of product quality.
When a CSTR is operated continuously at a steady state, ideally the concentration of any chemical involved should be approximately constant anywhere in the reactor and at all times. In reality, this ideal state is rarely achieved; thus, adjustments need to be made to operating parameters to ensure complete reaction.
Sometimes more than one reactor is used. In this system, approximately 80 percent of the alcohol and catalyst are added to the oil in a first-stage CSTR. Then, the reacted stream goes through a glycerol removal step before entering a second CSTR. The remaining 20 percent of the alcohol and catalyst are added to this reactor. This system provides a very complete reaction with the potential of using less alcohol than single-step systems.

Ultrasonic Biodiesel Reactors
Ultrasound is a useful tool to mix liquids that tend to separate. In biodiesel production, adequate mixing is required to create sufficient contact between the vegetable oil/animal fat and alcohol, especially at the beginning of the reaction. Ultrasonic waves cause intense mixing so that the reaction can proceed at a much faster rate.
Ultrasound transfers energy into fluid and creates violent vibrations, which form cavitation bubbles. As the bubbles burst, a sudden contraction of the fluid occurs, and the ingredients are mixed in the area of the bubbles. Such a high-energy action in liquid can considerably increase the reactivity of the reactant mixture and shorten the reaction time without involving elevated temperatures. In fact, this reaction can be achieved at or slightly above ambient temperature. Because there is no need to heat the mixture, energy may be saved.
The ultrasound processing results in similar yields of biodiesel with a much shortened reaction time compared to the conventional stirred-tank procedure.
Ultrasound can be a good choice for small producers (up to 2 million gallons per year capacity), who may only need one or two ultrasound probes per reactor vessel. However, using ultrasound in large-scale processing may be challenging because many ultrasound probes would be needed to reach every area of the reactant mixture.
Supercritical Reactors
Traditional biodiesel production requires a catalyst (usually sodium or potassium hydroxide) to complete the transesterification reaction. After the reaction, the catalyst has to be removed to ensure fuel quality. This can sometimes be problematic. To avoid the catalyst requirement, transesterification can be achieved in a catalyst-free manner by using a "supercritical" process.
A critical point of a fluid is defined by its critical temperature and critical pressure, "the highest temperature and highest pressure at which a pure chemical species is observed to exist in vapor/liquid equilibrium.
At the supercritical state, the phase boundary between liquid and vapor starts to disappear, and the substance has qualities of both a liquid and a vapor.
When transesterification occurs during the supercritical state of methanol (typically 300°C and 40 MPa/5800 psi or higher), the vegetable oil or animal fat dissolves in methanol to form a single phase. The reaction then occurs to reach completion in a few minutes without any catalysts.
The supercritical process tolerates water and free fatty acids in the system, and the soap formation that is common in the traditional process is eliminated.
Since the supercritical state demands very high temperature and pressure, the process can be expensive. Nevertheless, large biodiesel producers may find this process to be cost effective because, since the reaction happens so quickly, producers can make a large quantity with a relatively small reactor and limited space.
Static Mixers as Biodiesel Reactors
Static mixers are simple devices consisting of spiral-shaped internal parts within an enclosure, such as a tube or pipe, that promote turbulent flow. They have no moving parts, are easy to use and maintain, and are very effective at mixing liquids that are not readily miscible under normal conditions.
Biodiesel production from vegetable oils and alcohols is limited initially by the solubility of alcohol in vegetable oils. Static mixers can be used to mix the reactants before they enter the reactor vessel. The static mixer reactor is effective for biodiesel production. As with other reactor configurations, temperature and catalyst concentration influence the product yield significantly. The most favorable conditions for complete transesterification are 60°C and 1.5% catalyst for 30 minutes. It is feasible, therefore, to use a static mixer alone as the reactor for biodiesel preparation from vegetable oils and alcohols.
A similar process is sometimes used commercially, but the use of a large static mixer as the biodiesel processor has not been commercialized.
Reactive Distillation for Biodiesel Production
Reactive distillation (RD) is a chemical unit operation in which chemical reactions and product separations occur simultaneously in one unit. It is an effective alternative to the classic combination of reactor and separation units.
Reactive distillation is a common chemical process in situations where the reaction may reverse itself easily. The RD technique removes the reaction products from the reaction zone, thus preventing the reaction from reversing, and improving the overall conversion rate.
An RD system consists of numerous chambers with openings from one to the next. Ingredients are added to the first chamber, and as the mixture enters each successive chamber, the reaction progresses so that by the last chamber, the reaction is completed. Both packed and tray columns may be used for the RD applications; however, tray columns are preferred for homogeneous reaction systems because of the greater liquid holdup and the relatively longer retention time.
Reactive distillation systems have not been used commercially in biodiesel production because RD tends to be a complex process. However, the complexity is somewhat minimized when applied to biodiesel production for a few reasons. The difference between the boiling temperatures of methanol and fatty acid esters (biodiesel) is so large that the separation of these two streams becomes very easy. Because the transesterification reaction occurs in the liquid phase only, the reaction time is then established by the total liquid holdup and the feeding rate of the reactants.

The RD reactor system has three major advantages over the batch and traditional continuous-flow processes: 1) shorter reaction time (10 to 15 min) and higher unit productivity (7 to 9 gallons per gallon reactor volume per hour), which is highly desirable in commercial production units; 2) much lower excess alcohol requirement (approximately 3.5:1 molar), which greatly reduces the effort of downstream alcohol recovery and operating costs; and 3) lower capital costs due to its smaller size and the reduced need for alcohol recovery equipment.

Feedstocks for Biodiesel production in Greece

Biodiesel production in Greece can rely on a number of indigenous feedstocks with sunflower and cottonseed oils being the most promising current options. Rapeseed was introduced at experimental level a few years ago and its cultivation is at the moment at pilot and demonstration levels in several regions. The main drive for this has been the EC Directive 2003/30 and the increased demand from the biodiesel-producing companies.

Concerning future potential feedstocks like tomato seed oil and tobacco seed oil, laboratory test results on fuel quality lead to positive results for their future potential in the production of biodiesel. Combining that with the cultivated area, their respective biodiesel potential is high. It is generally believed that they can play an important role (especially the tomato seed oil) in the resource matrix in the long-term resource supply base.

In addition to the technical, economic and environmental considerations examined in this paper there is a number of critical issues that are expected to influence the future availability and supply of indigenous biomass feedstocks for biodiesel in the country concerning mainly land availability, climate change and agricultural lifestyle.

Land availability and quality will define the amount and type of feedstocks produced over the coming years. The use of low fertility, marginal land has been examined in a number of recent studies. However, production in marginal lands has to meet both economic and sustainable criteria in order to become competitive.

Climate change is likely to have a significant impact on both the availability of biomass as well as on feedstock types produced and their regional distribution. Greece already experiences dry arid conditions during the growing period of the crops examined in this paper, and future projections for the region are not positive stating that the increased risk of drought could lead to productivity losses and extreme weather conditions can significantly influence the supply of biomass feedstock.

Improve  the efficiency  of  agricultural lifestyle, finding new development pathways that lead to optimized sustainable production will also be a key issue for securing the supply of biomass feedstocks. This includes aspects of  optimized  water  management,  alternative  cropping strategies, etc.

So far, it is clear that indigenous biodiesel production in Greece will have to rely on a matrix of feedstocks with distinct features in terms of logistics and fuel quality.


Careful synergetic steps should be planned across the supply chain in order to ensure continuous resource flow throughout the year, capture the elements of land availability and future climatic conditions and avoiding major competition issues with the existing markets at local, regional and national level.

Straight vegetable oil (SVO) usage barriers and necessary engine modifications

The reason a diesel engine can not run on straight vegetable oil (SVO) is that the oil is too thick to run through the fuel lines and filters of the engine at the required rate, at ambient temperature . The design of the engine, especially the fuel system and combustion chamber, and the type of vegetable oil used will dictate at what ambient temperature the engine will start.

Even if the fuel system can pump the thicker oil there is risk of damage to the engine. SVO will not be injected into the cylinders as effectively as diesel fuel, the injector will not provide as fine a fuel mist with this less viscous oil. A mist of larger droplets will not burn as effectively causing difficulty with starting and incomplete combustion which will lead to build ups of carbon and vegetable oil residue. As deposits build in the engine they will cause the engine to run poorly because of low compression due to sticking piston rings or coked valves and poor injection spray pattern from build ups on the injector nozzle. A bad spray pattern will produce different combustion activities with a greater amount of incomplete combustion and possible piston damage due to increased heat on the piston surfaces, this can end in a holed piston.

Engine carbon build ups can be a problem with diesel fuelled engines which have not been run hard/hot enough. It is advisable to work diesel engines hard fairly regularly to burn this carbon from the engine, more so when running on vegetable oil. A standing start to high speed pedal to the metal run or a very long uphill haul has been shown to help. Extended periods at low engine load or tick over are best avoided when possible. Combustion is less complete from when the engine is first started until it reaches operating temperature as the piston rings do not seal as efficiently until the various engine components have expanded with the combustion heat. It is good practice to drive fairly hard upon first starting the vehicle to bring it up to operating temperature as soon as possible.

The greater effort required to pull the vegetable oil through fuel lines and filters can damage the fuel injector pump or the extra force required to move this oil through the pump causes extra stress on the timing belt/chain which could give out prematurely, causing costly engine damage.

Some engines have been found to be able to operate reliably under given conditions without modification when fuelled with certain oils.

a.Engine Modification
Engines have been designed to overcome potential problems and run on vegetable oil. Heating the fuel system allows the SVO to flow and an improved injector and combustion chamber design give better combustion.

b.Fuel Modification
Another solution is to thin the vegetable oil so that it behaves in a similar way to diesel fuel and can be used in existing diesel engines. There are a number of options below.

-Biodiesel
Biodiesel is a fuel made through transesterification. About 80% vegetable oil is mixed with 20% alcohol and a catalyst. A chemical reaction occurs transesterification) and you are left with biodiesel and glycerin which separate out when allowed to settle. Biodiesel in operation is comparable to fossil diesel in most ways.

-Micro Emulsions and Fuel Blends
Vegetable oil can be mixed with alcohols, diesel fuel, petrol, surfactants, cetane improvers, water and solvents in varying mixes and proportions to form a micro emulsion or a blend with suitable operating qualities

-Heating the Oil

Above 70 C vegetable oils have a viscosity approaching that of diesel fuel. The design of an engines fuel system and combustion chamber will dictate at what temperature vegetable oil can be reliably run as a fuel.

Heat exchanger and additional fuel tank to run biodiesel

Most diesel car engines are suitable for the use of Straight Vegetable Oil with certain modifications. Principally, the viscosity and surface tension of the SVO must be reduced by preheating it, typically by using waste heat from the engine or electricity, otherwise poor atomization, incomplete combustion and carbonization may result. One common solution is to add a heat exchanger and an additional fuel tank for the diesel or biodiesel blend and to switch between this additional tank and the main tank of SVO.
The engine is started on diesel, switched over to vegetable oil as soon as it is warmed up and switched back to diesel shortly before being switched off to ensure that no vegetable oil remains in the engine or fuel lines when it is started from cold again. In colder climates it is often necessary to heat the vegetable oil fuel lines and tank as it can become very viscous and even solidify.

Single tank conversions have been developed and have been used throughout Europe. These conversions are designed to provide reliable operation with vegetable oil. Modifications to the engines cold start regime assist combustion on start up and during the engine warm up phase. Suitably modified indirect injection (IDI) engines have proven to be operable with 100% SVO down to temperatures of  −10 °C. Direct injection (DI) engines generally have to be preheated with a block heater or diesel fired heater.. For long term durability it has been found necessary to increase the oil change frequency and to pay increased attention to engine maintenance.

SVO vs Biodiesel

SVO use, by contrast to biodiesel, requires a heated fuel system, and most often a second fuel tank and filter, to be able to start the engine, move the SVO from tank, through fuel lines, filter, injection pump and injectors, as well as to accomplish the best atomization within the engine (lowest emissions, and least likely to cause harm to the engine).

The objective is to heat the vegetable oil to approx. 70C at the point of injection. It is not necessary, or even desirable, to try and heat the SVO to this high temperature in the entire fuel system, only at the point of injection. So, SVO can be heated "progressively", along it's path from the tank to engine, and it is most effective to use a combination of coolant-based heaters at the tank, at the filter, etc. and then use an electric heater just before the injection pump.


In many cases, in warm and moderate climates, good new or lightly used cooking oils, it is not necessary to use a tank heater. However, with thicker "grease", that is, vegetable oil that has become more "hydrogenated" by its time in a fryer at high temperatures, and this in combination with cooler ambient (outdoor) temperatures, tank heaters can certainly be desirable. As an example, a system could function perfectly in Greece, or other warm/hot climates, year round, even on used cooking oil, without a tank heater and without a "heated path" (heating of the SVO fuel line by running coolant lines from the engine along its path to the tank)

SWOT analysis of the biodiesel market in Greece

SWOT analysis of the biodiesel market in Greece

Strengths: Beside a quite high and encouraging awareness about biodiesel among Greek citizens, Greece can count on diverse feedstock options: e.g. sunflower, rapeseed, soy and especially cotton (because of the flourishing Greek cotton industry). Biodiesel production capacities are very high. Uncertain policy framework (CAP reform) leads farmers to seek new cropping options. Another asset is represented by the establishment of some regional support for the first Biofuels Platform (in central Greece).
Weaknesses:
Semi-arid climate conditions restrict yield potentials and lack of available cultivable land: average yields for rape and sunflower seed are about 1,75 tonnes/ hectare which is nearly half of the EU average. Oil yields of cotton seeds are low (about 325 litres of oil/ ha). Dry arid conditions prevailing in the country restrict yielding potential without irrigation.  
Small farming size and low yields prevent cost effectiveness; therefore most of the biodiesel plants rely on imports. It is estimated that only about 1/3 of the feedstock for biodiesel production may be supplied domestically. The current quota system does not create secure market conditions for investors. There is also an ongoing quality debate on biodiesel versus pure plant oil.
Opportunities:
There is a need to identify low input supply options as part of land use strategies to cope with more stringent future restrictions (e.g. water restrictions, etc.). Optimization of the use of residues and processing of by-products could also be crucial to improve biodiesel economics.
Increase biodiesel uses for heating applications may also provide more market opportunities. The introduction of a ‘policy mix’ with tax exemptions & mandatory targets will enable to create more certain market conditions.
Threats:
Quality: Variety of feedstocks with different physical and chemical properties. 9Market: not well established, limited end uses (only transport sector in certain areas for certain end users) and inflexible production quotas.
Policy: uncertainty deriving from the annual quota system and annual allocation of detaxation. Sustainability: careful selection of crops to minimise risks of erosion, water scarcity, etc. in the future supply chains.
International trade: low cost supply from neighboring Balkan countries although this is also an opportunity for cheap raw materials use.

Awareness: Create communication channels & synergies with the farming community.

EU energy strategy for transport after 2020

Biofuels are returning to the political agenda in Europe as EU policymakers start to shape a strategy for reducing greenhouse gas emissions from transport after 2020. Biofuels producers continue to argue that they are an essential part of the solution, even as the low oil price puts an end to several cutting-edge projects, the European Commission prepares to publish a new report about indirect land-use change (ILUC) and some stakeholders urge a full focus on electrification.
It is obvious for EU biofuels producers that they are part of the solution. The big change since the EU’s first climate and energy package in 2008 is the rise of electric vehicles. In contrast, we’ve seen very little progress in liquid fuels.
The European Commission will issue proposals to decarbonize the transport sector later this year. The first milestone to look out for is a legislative proposal in spring for national emission reduction targets covering economic sectors outside the EU Emission Trading scheme (ETS), i.e. transport, buildings and agriculture.
In October 2014, European leaders agreed to cut emissions from these sectors by 30% by 2030 versus 2005 levels. Transport accounts for the largest share, a third, of these emissions. At the same time, the Commission will issue a non-legislative strategy for decarbonizing the transport sector and launch a public consultation on bioenergy. The latter will feed into proposals for a new EU renewable energy directive with sustainability criteria for solid and gaseous biomass as well as biofuels due by the end of the year. A consultation on the new directive just ended on 10 February.
When it comes to biofuels specifically, the Commission recognizes that it needs to do something. If we look at the current development of oil prices, it is very certain that at least in the short to medium term, the regulatory framework will be very important for the perspectives of biofuels.
So far the Commission has proposed neither to extend a renewable energy quota for the transport sector nor a greenhouse gas emission reduction target for fuel suppliers beyond 2020.
What has become ever clearer over time is that the future of biofuels in Europe lies in using advanced feedstocks such as energy crops grown on marginal land, and wastes and residues. Biofuels that rely on arable land have been discredited by studies that accuse them of indirect land-use change (ILUC), i.e. that their cultivation indirectly displaces forest and therefore increases carbon emissions. The existence and degree of ILUC continues to be contested by the biofuels industry.
This is why all eyes are turning to a new ILUC study that experts say will underpin post-2020 EU biofuels policy. The work, carried out by a consortium of consultancies – Ecofys, IIASA and E4Tech – uses a model called “GLOBIOM” to model ILUC for different feedstocks and policy scenarios. The work was finished last autumn, but the Commission has yet to publish it. Some of those involved expect it by the summer, others believe that the Commission may wait until the end of the year.
ILUC remains very sensitive – it basically refutes any contribution of biodiesel to climate action – and new findings are certain to displease some. In this case, the study will confirm that the ILUC concept is true. The results remain confidential, but another source close to the work suggests that the new model does not overturn basic earlier conclusions: There is anything that will fundamentally affect our understanding of the impact of European biofuels policy. There is nothing that fundamentally affects our understanding of the hierarchy between different feedstocks.
A biofuel is low-ILUC risk when it can be demonstrated that additional biofuel feedstock is produced compared to the existing situation. This can be done through increasing crop yields (in a sustainable manner), reducing supply chain inefficiencies, and expanding into low-carbon, low-biodiversity land.
There are some signs that the Commission is starting to think about advanced biofuels for sectors like aviation as an industrial development opportunity. Experts are currently exploring whether and how the conventional biofuel industry could help grow advanced biofuels. Traditional biofuels will have to be accompanied by new options. The good news however, is that the same biofuels volumes can contribute more to decarbonisation than we thought in the past. That just leaves policymakers to decide on ILUC.